Syntax abuse

How is (eqv? do 1) interpreted?

Racket, MIT, Gambit, SISC, Chez, SCM, Ikarus, Larceny, Mosh, SigScheme, SXM, VSCM, Chibi report bad syntax.

Chicken, Bigloo, Scheme48/scsh, STklos report an undefined variable.

Gauche, Guile, Kawa, Scheme 9, S7, Sagittarius report #f.


Back to Scheme Surveys

Page source (GitHub)